Google’s John Mueller provided a easy answer to a Redditor who blamed Google’s “AI” for a be aware within the SERPs saying that the web site was down since early 2026.
The Redditor didn’t create a publish on Reddit, they simply linked to their weblog publish that blamed Google and AI. This enabled Mueller to go straight to the positioning, determine the trigger as having to do with JavaScript implementation, after which set them straight that it wasn’t Google’s fault.
Redditor Blames Google’s AI
The weblog publish by the Redditor blames Google, headlining the article with a pc science buzzword salad that over-complicates and (unknowingly) misstates the precise downside.
The article title is:
“Google Would possibly Suppose Your Web site Is Down
How Cross-page AI aggregation can introduce new legal responsibility vectors.”
That half about “cross-page AI aggregation” and “legal responsibility vectors” is eyebrow elevating as a result of none of these phrases are established phrases of artwork in laptop science.
The “cross-page” factor is probably going a reference to Google’s Question Fan-Out, the place a query on Google’s AI Mode is changed into a number of queries which can be then despatched to Google’s Traditional Search.
Concerning “legal responsibility vectors,” a vector is an actual factor that’s mentioned in search engine optimization and is part of Pure Language Processing (NLP). However “Legal responsibility Vector” is just not part of it.
The Redditor’s weblog publish admits that they don’t know if Google is ready to detect if a web site is down or not:
“I’m not conscious of Google having any particular functionality to detect whether or not web sites are up or down. And even when my inside service went down, Google wouldn’t be capable of detect that because it’s behind a login wall.”
And so they seem to perhaps not concentrate on how RAG or Question Fan-Out works, or perhaps how Google’s AI techniques work. The writer appears to treat it as a discovery that Google is referencing recent info as a substitute of Parametric Information (info within the LLM that was gained from coaching).
They write that Google’s AI reply says that the web site indicated the positioning was offline since 2026.:
“…the phrasing says the web site indicated moderately than individuals indicated; although within the age of LLMs uncertainty, that distinction may not imply a lot anymore.
…it clearly mentions the timeframe as early 2026. Because the web site didn’t exist earlier than mid-2025, this truly suggests Google has comparatively recent info; though once more, LLMs!”
Slightly later within the weblog publish the Redditor admits that they don’t know why Google is saying that the web site is offline.
They defined that they applied a shot at midnight answer by eradicating a pop-up. They have been incorrectly guessing that it was the pop-up that was inflicting the problem and this highlights the significance of being sure of what’s inflicting points earlier than making modifications within the hope that it will repair them.
The Redditor shared they didn’t know the way Google summarizes details about a web site in response to a question in regards to the web site, and expressed their concern that they imagine it’s doable that Google can scrape irrelevant info then present it as a solution.
They write:
“…we don’t know the way precisely Google assembles the combination of pages it makes use of to generate LLM responses.
That is problematic as a result of something in your internet pages may now affect unrelated solutions.
…Google’s AI may seize any of this and current it as the reply.”
I don’t fault the writer for not realizing how Google AI search works, I’m pretty sure it’s not extensively recognized. It’s straightforward to get the impression that it’s an AI answering questions.
However what’s mainly happening is that AI search is predicated on Traditional Search, with AI synthesizing the content material it finds on-line right into a pure language reply. It’s like asking somebody a query, they Google it, then they clarify the reply from what they realized from studying the web site pages.
Google’s John Mueller Explains What’s Going On
Mueller responded to the particular person’s Reddit publish in a impartial and well mannered method, exhibiting why the fault lies within the Redditor’s implementation.
Mueller defined:
“Is that your web site? I’d advocate not utilizing JS to alter textual content in your web page from “not out there” to “out there” and as a substitute to only load that entire chunk from JS. That means, if a consumer doesn’t run your JS, it received’t get deceptive info.
That is just like how Google doesn’t advocate utilizing JS to alter a robots meta tag from “noindex” to “please contemplate my superb work of html markup for inclusion” (there isn’t a “index” robots meta tag, so that you may be artistic).”
Mueller’s response explains that the positioning is counting on JavaScript to exchange placeholder textual content that’s served briefly earlier than the web page masses, which solely works for guests whose browsers truly run that script.
What occurred right here is that Google learn that placeholder textual content that the online web page confirmed because the listed content material. Google noticed the unique served content material with the “not out there” message and handled it because the content material.
Mueller defined that the safer method is to have the proper info current within the web page’s base HTML from the beginning, in order that each customers and search engines like google obtain the identical content material.
Takeaways
There are a number of takeaways right here that transcend the technical subject underlying the Redditor’s downside. Prime of the listing is how they tried to guess their option to a solution.
They actually didn’t know the way Google AI search works, which launched a sequence of assumptions that difficult their potential to diagnose the problem. Then they applied a “repair” primarily based on guessing what they thought was most likely inflicting the problem.
Guessing is an method to search engine optimization issues that’s justified on Google being opaque however generally it’s not about Google, it’s a couple of information hole in search engine optimization itself and a sign that additional testing and prognosis is critical.
Featured Picture by Shutterstock/Kues