Additive manufacturing in dentistry is maturing, however not uniformly. A brand new examine from Additive Manufacturing Analysis (AMR) charts a market wherein low-cost LCD distributors are transferring spectacular unit volumes whereas some suppliers nonetheless command a disproportionate share of income. It’s a two-speed system: diffusion on the desktop, monetisation within the validated stack.
Scott Dunham, AMR’s vice-president of analysis and lead writer, describes the agency’s method as hybrid, “bottom-up modelling… starting on the degree of the businesses supplying the important thing print expertise,” adopted by “top-down inputs” to “dial in” the place wanted. The workflow mirrors the worth chain: {hardware} put in base, ensuing supplies demand, after which print providers. It’s a practical solution to observe the place worth really accrues.
A shifting energy map
AMR’s report separates unit leaders from income leaders, helpful, as a result of they’re not the identical. Quantity progress on the low finish is increasing the put in base and coaching customers; income concentrates round distributors that bind {hardware} to validated supplies, software program and repair. Stack possession nonetheless beats field delivery.
Geography will add recent pressure. Requested who would possibly disrupt the income rankings, Dunham factors to Asia: the “dental care hole is bigger,” and new suppliers could “combine digital and 3D printing from the get-go,” somewhat than grafting instruments onto legacy workflows. Within the West, company dentistry is the counterweight. Consolidation is “much less authorities managed,” he notes, and 3D printing is more and more used “as a differentiator and scale manufacturing alternative.” Anticipate each bottom-up adoption and top-down procurement to maneuver the needle—typically on the identical time.
Ceramics creep, metals plateau
The report’s most consequential name is modest: ceramics are edging towards manufacturing. Dunham ties “readiness” mainly to regulatory approvals of Class II supplies and to centered, indication-specific programs, “one-off crown printing” platforms amongst them. The implication is much less a single expertise leap and extra a gradual broadening of validated workflows.
What does that imply for metallic powder mattress fusion? “Manufacturing volumes for many metallic restorations/gadgets [are] principally flat going ahead,” Dunham says. Metallic retains room to develop as labs digitise, however some cannibalisation is probably going, even in workhorses equivalent to detachable partial dentures, as monolithic AM dentures and different non-metal routes mature. The portfolio immediate for labs and OEMs is obvious: defend metallic the place it’s mission-critical; lean into ceramic-centric workflows the place regulation, supplies and throughput now align.
Chairside, however measured
On in-office printing, AMR’s view is disciplined somewhat than breathless. Previous expertise with subtractive chairside programs affords a template: effectivity frees capability; whole case volumes rise; and labs nonetheless “go up some as a result of the whole lot obtained extra environment friendly and no one can do all of it,” Dunham says. As for accelerants, he flags focused, validated programs—“a ‘crown printer’ utilizing Class II,” citing SprintRay’s MIDAS idea—as potential nudges somewhat than step-changes. Adoption is continuing at a “pretty regular tempo.”
For labs, the lesson just isn’t apocalypse however repositioning. Clinics will more and more do one thing in-house; the “one thing” will creep up in worth as workflows simplify and validate. Labs that specialise, proudly owning design, tough indications, multi-material integration, and compliance—ought to fare higher than labs reliant on commodity quantity alone.
Software program: central, under-discussed
Considered one of AMR’s extra necessary alerts is that software program is the most important income section throughout dental AM. That squares with what practitioners see: the economics stay in validated CAD/CAM pipelines, nesting and scheduling, DICOM-to-model tooling, QA/traceability, and more and more AI-assisted design. The report’s construction retains the give attention to {hardware} and supplies, however the income combine suggests the place aggressive moats are deepening.
Learn the trendlines
Taken collectively, the trendlines are coherent:
Stack economics: Distributors that couple {hardware} to validated resins/ceramics, software program, and repair contracts will shield income share whilst unit costs compress.
Supplies shift: Class II ceramic momentum plus flat metallic volumes factors to cautious portfolio rebalancing.
Channel evolution: Chairside shall be additive to labs within the close to time period; medium-term impression is determined by how rapidly indication-specific programs develop their accredited use.
AMR’s full examine goes additional, company-level estimates, regional splits, and the comparative reveals that flip generalities into selections. Readers who want the drill-down on distributors, supplies trajectories and chairside vs lab economics will discover these particulars there.
3DPI readers can get a 25% low cost on the report, simply enter the code “3DPI25” to say.
Be part of us at AMA: Healthcare the place Scott Dunham will present additional insights into 3D Printing for Dentistry.