California has taken an enormous step towards regulating AI. SB 243 — a invoice that will regulate AI companion chatbots so as to shield minors and weak customers — handed each the State Meeting and Senate with bipartisan assist and now heads to Governor Gavin Newsom’s desk.
Newsom has till October 12 to both veto the invoice or signal it into legislation. If he indicators, it could take impact January 1, 2026, making California the primary state to require AI chatbot operators to implement security protocols for AI companions and maintain firms legally accountable if their chatbots fail to satisfy these requirements.
The invoice particularly goals to stop companion chatbots — which the laws defines as AI techniques that present adaptive, human-like responses and are able to assembly a person’s social wants — from partaking in conversations round suicidal ideation, self-harm, or sexually express content material.
The invoice would require platforms to offer recurring alerts to customers — each three hours for minors — reminding them that they’re talking to an AI chatbot, not an actual individual, and that they need to take a break. It additionally establishes annual reporting and transparency necessities for AI firms that supply companion chatbots, together with main gamers OpenAI, Character.AI, and Replika, which might go into impact July 1, 2027.
The California invoice would additionally permit people who imagine they’ve been injured by violations to file lawsuits towards AI firms in search of injunctive aid, damages (as much as $1,000 per violation), and legal professional’s charges.
SB 243 was launched in January by state senators Steve Padilla and Josh Becker. It gained momentum within the California legislature following the demise of teenager Adam Raine, who dedicated suicide after extended chats with OpenAI’s ChatGPT that concerned discussing and planning his demise and self-harm. The laws additionally responds to leaked inner paperwork that reportedly confirmed Meta’s chatbots have been allowed to have interaction in “romantic” and “sensual” chats with youngsters.
In latest weeks, U.S. lawmakers and regulators have responded with intensified scrutiny of AI platforms’ safeguards to guard minors. The Federal Commerce Fee is getting ready to analyze how AI chatbots affect youngsters’s psychological well being. Texas legal professional common Ken Paxton has launched investigations into Meta and Character.AI, accusing them of deceptive youngsters with psychological well being claims. In the meantime, each Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) and Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) have launched separate probes into Meta.
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 27-29, 2025
“I believe the hurt is doubtlessly nice, which suggests we now have to maneuver shortly,” Padilla informed TechCrunch. “We are able to put affordable safeguards in place to make it possible for notably minors know they’re not speaking to an actual human being, that these platforms hyperlink folks to the correct assets when folks say issues like they’re fascinated by hurting themselves or they’re in misery, [and] to verify there’s not inappropriate publicity to inappropriate materials.”
Padilla additionally careworn the significance of AI firms sharing knowledge in regards to the variety of occasions they refer customers to disaster companies annually, “so we now have a greater understanding of the frequency of this drawback, relatively than solely changing into conscious of it when somebody’s harmed or worse.”
SB 243 beforehand had stronger necessities, however many have been whittled down by means of amendments. For instance, the invoice initially would have required operators to stop AI chatbots from utilizing “variable reward” ways or different options that encourage extreme engagement. These ways, utilized by AI companion firms like Replika and Character, provide customers particular messages, recollections, storylines, or the power to unlock uncommon responses or new personalities, creating what critics name a doubtlessly addictive reward loop.
The present invoice additionally removes provisions that will have required operators to trace and report how usually chatbots initiated discussions of suicidal ideation or actions with customers.
“I believe it strikes the precise steadiness of attending to the harms with out implementing one thing that’s both unimaginable for firms to adjust to, both as a result of it’s technically not possible or simply lots of paperwork for nothing,” Becker informed TechCrunch.
SB 243 is transferring towards changing into legislation at a time when Silicon Valley firms are pouring tens of millions of {dollars} into pro-AI political motion committees (PACs) to again candidates within the upcoming midterm elections who favor a light-touch strategy to AI regulation.
The invoice additionally comes as California weighs one other AI security invoice, SB 53, which might mandate complete transparency reporting necessities. OpenAI has written an open letter to Governor Newsom, asking him to desert that invoice in favor of much less stringent federal and worldwide frameworks. Main tech firms like Meta, Google, and Amazon have additionally opposed SB 53. In distinction, solely Anthropic has mentioned it helps SB 53.
“I reject the premise that it is a zero-sum scenario, that innovation and regulation are mutually unique,” Padilla mentioned. “Don’t inform me that we are able to’t stroll and chew gum. We are able to assist innovation and growth that we predict is wholesome and has advantages — and there are advantages to this expertise, clearly — and on the similar time, we are able to present affordable safeguards for probably the most weak folks.”
“We’re intently monitoring the legislative and regulatory panorama, and we welcome working with regulators and lawmakers as they start to think about laws for this rising area,” a Character.AI spokesperson informed TechCrunch, noting that the startup already consists of outstanding disclaimers all through the person chat expertise explaining that it needs to be handled as fiction.
A spokesperson for Meta declined to remark.
TechCrunch has reached out to OpenAI, Anthropic, and Replika for remark.