Kimi K2 (by Moonshot AI) and Llama 4 (by Meta) are each state-of-the-art open giant language fashions (LLMs) based mostly on Combination-of-Specialists (MoE) structure. Every mannequin focuses on totally different areas and is aimed toward superior use instances, with totally different strengths and philosophies. Until every week in the past, Llama 4 was the undisputed king of the open-source LLMs, however now lots of people are saying that Kimi’s newest mannequin is giving Meta’s greatest a run for its cash. On this weblog, we’ll check these two fashions for varied duties to search out which of Kimi K2 vs Llama 4 is one of the best open-source mannequin. Let the battle of one of the best start!
Kimi K2 vs Llama 4: Mannequin Comparability
Kimi K2 by Moonshot AI is an open-source, combination of consultants (MoE) mannequin with 1 trillion whole parameters, with 32 B energetic parameters. The mannequin comes with a 128K token context window. The mannequin is skilled with the Muon optimizer and excels at duties like coding, reasoning, and agentic duties like instrument integration and multi-step reasoning.
Llama 4 by Meta AI is a household of mixture-of-experts-based multimodal fashions that had been launched in three totally different variants: Scout, Maverick, and Behemoth. Scout comes with 17B energetic parameters & 10 M token window; Maverick with 17 B energetic parameters and 1 M token window, whereas Behemoth (nonetheless in coaching) is alleged to supply 288 B energetic parameters with over 2 trillion tokens in whole! The fashions include sturdy context dealing with, improved administration of delicate content material, and decrease refusal charges
| Characteristic | Kimi K2 | Llama 4 Scout | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mannequin sort | MoE giant LLM, open-weight | MoE multimodal, open-weight | MoE multimodal, open-weight |
| Energetic params | 32 B | 17 B | 17 B |
| Complete params | 1 T | 109 B | 400 B |
| Context window | 128 Ok tokens | 10 million tokens | 1 million tokens |
| Key strengths | Coding, reasoning, agentic duties, open | Light-weight, lengthy context, environment friendly | Coding, reasoning, efficiency rivaling proprietary fashions |
| Accessibility | Obtain and use freely | Public with license constraints | Public with license constraints |
To know extra about these fashions, their benchmarks and efficiency, learn our earlier articles:
Kimi K2 vs Llama 4: Benchmark Comparability
Kimi K2 and Llama 4 each are desk toppers of their efficiency on varied benchmarks. Here’s a temporary breakdown of their efficiency:
| Benchmark | What does this imply? | Kimi K2 | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA-Diamond | That is to check LLM reasoning in superior Physics | 75.1 % | 67.7 % |
| AIME | That is to check the LLM for mathematical reasoning | 49.5 % | 25.2 % |
| LiveCodeBench | This checks a mannequin’s real-world coding skills. | 53.7 % | 47.3 % |
| SWE‑bench | This checks a mannequin’s capacity to put in writing production-ready code | 65.8 % | 18.4 % |
| OJBench | It measures the mannequin’s problem-solving capacity. | 27.1 % | — |
| MMLU‑Professional | A tutorial benchmark that checks normal data and comprehension | — | 79.4 % |
Kimi K2 and Llama 4: How you can entry?
To check these fashions for various duties, we’ll use the chat interface.
Choose the mannequin from the mannequin drop down current the the highest left aspect of the display.
Kimi K2 vs Llama 4: Efficiency Comparability
Now that now we have seen varied fashions and benchmark comparisons between Kimi K2 and Llama 4, we’ll now check them for varied options like:
- Multimodality
- Agentic Behaviour and Instrument Use
- Multilingual Capabilities
Activity 1: Multimodality
- Llama 4: Natively multimodal (can collectively course of photographs and textual content), therefore perfect for doc evaluation, visible grounding, and data-rich situations.
- Kimi K2: Centered on superior reasoning, coding, and agentic instrument use, however has much less native multimodal help in comparison with Llama
Immediate: “Extract Contents from this picture”
Output:
Overview:
The outputs generated by the 2 LLMs are starkly totally different. With Llama 4 it feels prefer it learn by means of all of the textual content of the picture like a professional. Nonetheless, Kimi K2 states that the handwriting is illegible and may’t be learn. However whenever you look carefully, the textual content supplied by Llama isn’t the identical because the textual content that was there within the picture! The mannequin made up textual content at a number of locations (instance – affected person title, even analysis), which is the height stage of LLM hallucination.
On the face it might really feel like we’re getting an in depth picture evaluation, however Llama 4’s output is sure to dupe you. Whereas Kimi K2 – proper from the get go – mentions that it could actually’t perceive what’s written, this bitter fact is means higher than a stupendous lie.
Thus, in relation to picture evaluation, each Kimi K2 and Llama 4 nonetheless battle and are unable to learn complicated photographs correctly.
Activity 2: Agentic Conduct and Instrument Use
- Kimi K2: Particularly post-trained for agentic workflows – can execute intentions, independently run shell instructions, construct apps/web sites, name APIs, automate knowledge science, and conduct multi-step workflows out-of-the-box.
- Llama 4: Though good in logic, imaginative and prescient, and evaluation, its agentic conduct isn’t as sturdy or as open (principally multimodal reasoning).
Immediate: “Discover the highest 5 shares on NSE in the present day and inform me what their share value was on 12 January 2025?”
Output:
Overview:
Llama 4 isn’t up for this activity. It lacks agentic capabilities, and therefore, it could actually’t entry the net search instrument to entry the insights wanted for the immediate. Now, coming to Kimi K2, on the primary look, it might seem that Kimi K2 has carried out the job! However a better evaluate is required right here. It’s able to utilizing totally different instruments based mostly on the duty, nevertheless it didn’t perceive the duty appropriately. It was anticipated to verify for the highest inventory performers for in the present day, and provides their costs for 12 Jan 2025; as an alternative, it simply gave a listing of high performers of 12 Jan 2025. Agentic – Sure! However Good – not a lot – Kimi K2 is simply okay.
Activity 3: Multilingual Capabilities
- Llama 4: Educated on knowledge for 200 totally different languages, together with stable multi-lingual and cross-lingual abilities.
- Kimi K2: International help, however particularly sturdy in Chinese language and English (highest scores on Chinese language language benchmarks).
Immediate: “Translate the contents of the pdf to Hindi.PDF Hyperlink“
Be aware: To check Llama 4 for this immediate, you may also take a picture of the PDF and share it as many of the free LLM suppliers don’t permit importing paperwork of their free plan.
Output:
Overview:
At this activity, each fashions carried out equally properly. Each Llama 4 and Kimi K2 effectively translate French into Hindi. Each the fashions recognised the supply of the poem, too. The response generated by each fashions was the identical and proper. Thus, in relation to multilingual help, Kimi K2 is nearly as good as Llama 4.
Open-source nature and value
Kimi K2: Totally open-source, could be deployed regionally, weights and API can be found to everybody, prices for inference and API are considerably decrease ($0.15- $0.60/1M enter tokens, $2.50/1M output tokens).
Llama 4: solely accessible below a neighborhood license (restrictions might happen by area), barely larger infrastructure necessities attributable to context dimension, and is usually much less versatile for self-hosted, manufacturing use instances.
Remaining Verdict:
| Activity | Kimi K2 | Llama 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Multimodality | ✅ | ❌ |
| Agentic conduct & Instrument use | ✅ | ❌ |
| Multilingual Capabilities | ❌ | ✅ |
- Use Kimi K2: If you need high-end coding, reasoning, and agentic automation, significantly when valuing full open-source availability, extraordinarily low price, and native deployment. Kimi K2 is presently forward on key measures in case you are a developer making high-end instruments, workflows, or utilizing LLMs on a finances.
- Use Llama 4: In case you want extraordinarily giant context reminiscence, nice understanding of language, and open supply availability. It stands out in visible evaluation, doc processing, and cross-modal analysis/enterprise duties.
Conclusion
To say, Kimi K2 is best than Llama 4 would possibly simply be an overstatement. Each fashions have their professionals and cons. Llama 4 may be very fast, whereas Kimi K2 is kind of complete. Llama 4 is extra liable to make issues up, whereas Kimi K2 would possibly shrink back from even making an attempt. Each are nice open-source fashions and provide customers a spread of options corresponding to these by closed-source fashions like GPT 4o, Gemini 2.0 Flash, and extra. To select one out of the 2 is barely difficult, however you possibly can take the decision based mostly in your activity.
Or perhaps strive them each and see which one you want higher?
Information Scientist | AWS Licensed Options Architect | AI & ML Innovator
As a Information Scientist at Analytics Vidhya, I specialise in Machine Studying, Deep Studying, and AI-driven options, leveraging NLP, laptop imaginative and prescient, and cloud applied sciences to construct scalable functions.
With a B.Tech in Pc Science (Information Science) from VIT and certifications like AWS Licensed Options Architect and TensorFlow, my work spans Generative AI, Anomaly Detection, Pretend Information Detection, and Emotion Recognition. Enthusiastic about innovation, I attempt to develop clever methods that form the way forward for AI.
Login to proceed studying and luxuriate in expert-curated content material.