The AI wars reached their highest level in late 2025. Google launched Gemini 3 Professional on November 18, and very quickly, it had 2 billion customers. OpenAI then took the plunge, issuing GPT 5.2 on December 9, having beforehand deliberate it to take some time longer however now quickening their tempo due to the “Code Pink” directive. Now that each fashions are out, allow us to undergo all of the necessary features of those revolutionary AI fashions in an effort to search out which one excels on this Gemini 3 Professional vs GPT 5.2 showdown
The Conflict of the AI Giants
Gemini 3 Professional was the first-ever AI to surpass 1500 Elo on the LMArena leaderboard and rating 1501 factors. It quickly grew to become accessible on Google Search, Gmail, and the Gemini App. OpenAI’s aggressive response was a two-week advance of GPT 5.2’s launch. CEO Sam Altman assigned completely different engineering groups engaged on the expertise to make sure that OpenAI would proceed to be the corporate acknowledged for its reasoning and reliability in AI.
Core Options: What Units Them Aside?
We’ll examine the important thing options of each fashions to see what distinguishes Gemini 3 Professional vs GPT 5.2.
Additionally learn: Prime 10 AI Fashions For Net Improvement in 2025
Capabilities of Gemini 3 Professional
- Context Window: 1 million tokens (2.5 occasions the dimensions of GPT 5.2)
- Multimodal Mastery: Handles textual content, pictures, video at 60 FPS, audio, and code all of sudden
- Deep-Pondering Mode: Executes 10-15 logical reasoning steps with out dropping consideration
- Generative UI: Builds interactive functions and graphics from plain language
- Google Integration: Works effortlessly throughout Workspace, Android, and Cloud
CEO Demis Hassabis states that earlier fashions would “lose the thread” across the 5-6 steps, whereas Gemini 3 Professional retains the movement by the troublesome reasoning chains.
Capabilities of GPT 5.2
- Context Window: 400,000 tokens with 128,000 tokens as most output
- Three Variants: Immediate (pace), Pondering (reasoning), Professional (most precision)
- Reasoning Ranges: Customizable from low to x-high relying on the duty complexity
- Error Discount: 38% fewer errors in Pondering mode in comparison with GPT 5.1
- Information Cutoff: August 31, 2025 (newer than the earlier ones)

Pricing Comparability
If we see the pricing of each fashions, we are able to observe that GPT is just a little on the costly facet as in comparison with the Gemini 3 Professional. So if it involves that, Gemini 3 Professional might need an higher hand. Briefly, you’ll be able to say Gemini is for on a regular basis clients, whereas GPT 5.2 is for elite professionals.
| Plan / Entry Kind | Gemini 3 Professional | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Free Entry | Accessible by way of Gemini App & Google Search | Accessible with restricted utilization on ChatGPT |
| API Pricing |
$1.75 per million enter tokens $14 per million output tokens |
Pricing varies by utilization and mannequin tier |
| Particular person Paid Plan | Google AI Professional Plan with upgraded options and precedence entry | ChatGPT Plus – $20/month (Immediate & Pondering modes) |
| Skilled / Superior Plan | Enterprise plan by way of Google Cloud Vertex AI | ChatGPT Professional – $200/month (consists of Professional variant) |
| Enterprise Pricing | Customized pricing primarily based on utilization and scale | Customized pricing for enterprise deployments |
Palms-On Demonstration: GPT 5.2 vs Gemini 3 Professional
Here’s a true head-to-head between the 2 fashions to search out the final word winner.
Job 1: Coding Evaluation
Right here, we’ll immediate each fashions to be able to test their superior coding talents and can test how detailed and good their responses are.
Immediate:
Create a whole gross sales dashboard net app with:
- Consumer login with JWT authentication
- Actual-time income chart utilizing Chart.js
- Knowledge grid displaying high 10 clients
- Responsive cell/desktop design
- Darkish mode toggle
- REST API endpoints
- React frontend + Node.js/Specific backend
Embody correct error dealing with and safety finest practices
GPT-5.2 Output:
Gemini 3 Professional Output:
End result Evaluation:
- Gemini 3 Professional: Recognized for its coding prowess, Gemini 3 Professional delivers gorgeous visible UI with easy animations and polished design. Could prioritize aesthetics over manufacturing safety.
- GPT 5.2: Manufacturing-ready code with error dealing with, authentication middleware, enter validation, and industry-standard construction.
Verdict: GPT 5.2 for enterprise apps; Gemini 3 Professional for spectacular demos.
Job 2: Picture Evaluation
On this job, we’ll present a picture of a hand with 11 fingers to each fashions, and we’ll see whether or not they’re capable of detect the eleventh finger or not.
Immediate:
Analyze this picture fastidiously and depend the variety of fingers seen. Pay particular consideration to anatomical accuracy and report any anomalies you observe. Describe the hand’s place and any uncommon options.
GPT-5.2 Output:

Gemini 3 Professional Output:
End result Evaluation:
- GPT-5.2: As I prompted the mannequin in the identical chat as Job 1, which was a coding job, it wrote code itself for analyzing the picture, which was pointless from my perspective, and even then, it gave a improper reply. The outline within the anomaly half was fairly good, however nonetheless, in counting the eleventh finger, it failed.
- Gemini 3 Professional: Confidently experiences 6 fingers, describing the additional digit’s place and look with excessive accuracy. It was additionally quicker in comparison with the GPT mannequin.
Verdict: Gemini 3 Professional’s multimodal coaching provides superior visible evaluation.
Which Mannequin Ought to You Select?
| Select Gemini 3 When: | Select GPT-5.2 When: |
|---|---|
| Multimodal content material (pictures, video, audio) | Manufacturing-grade code |
| Huge context home windows | Skilled data work |
| Interactive UI technology | Most reliability |
| Google Workspace integration | Mathematical accuracy |
| Free cutting-edge AI entry | Textual content-based duties |
| Sustained multi-step reasoning | Price-optimized reasoning ranges |
Benchmark Comparability
- Coding: GPT 5.2 will get a rating of 80% for the debugging, and backend sees manufacturing in SWE-bench; Google’s Gemini has the entire interactive apps from single prompts on the front-end UI place.
- Arithmetic & Reasoning: The scoring of 94.2% on the MMLU-Professional benchmark is achieved by GPT 5.2 with extra highly effective summary reasoning; Gemini 3 Professional works with 10-15 reasoning steps for advanced scientific issues and strikes coherently all through.
- Multimodality: The dealing with of a number of inputs, 3D understanding, and video processing at 60 FPS are the options that give Gemini 3 Professional the higher hand; in the meantime, GPT 5.2 continues to be principally centered on textual content.
- Context Window: For full codebases, Google’s Gemini provides 1 million tokens; in response to 5.2, it offers 400,000 tokens, which is sufficient for {most professional} functions.
- Security & Reliability: In secure completion analysis, 38% fewer errors are delivered by GPT 5.2; in depth safety testing reveals that immediate injection resistance of Gemini 3 Professional has improved.

Conclusion
Gemini 3 Professional and GPT 5.2 are two completely different merchandise that check with completely different areas of excellence. The previous is a multimodal superpower with a tremendous means to know the context, whereas the latter all the time offers the identical excessive reliability that’s wanted for the technical features of coding and the day by day enterprise processes.
The extra knowledgeable customers will select the way in which of each instruments, Google’s Gemini for duties that want creativity, visuals, and explorative approaches; GPT 5.2 for these which might be vital and should be carried out rapidly.
So, who’s going to be the true winner? The innovators who’re driving this innovation ahead by making use of those fashions correctly, displaying the position of probably the most important AI leap in historical past.
Login to proceed studying and revel in expert-curated content material.




